NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock1455MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)

1280 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +199%

8.94 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

2.989 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

May 2015

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

Crystal System

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

-

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1365 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

174.7GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

-

Compute Units

28

3072

Shading Units

1792

96

TMUs

112

48

ROPs

32

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

12 MB

L2 Cache

-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

26.69 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

93.41 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.989 TFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Amethyst

-

GPU Variant

Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

5 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

366 mm²

Board Design

35W

TDP

250W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7510M

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Related News

1

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

2

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

3

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

4

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

5

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products

6

NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs

7

Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon

8

Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!

9

Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs

10

Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher