Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6064 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +33312%
26.73 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
80
192
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy