Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +15810%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
825 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
13.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.748 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.992 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
167.8 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
29W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF119
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy