Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5346%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
16
6144
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy