NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

VS

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 7 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1560MHz vs 1114MHz)

3072 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages

More VRAM (24GB vs 20GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 280.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +180%

19.17 TFLOPS

Quadro M6000 24 GB

6.844 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +678%

3612

Quadro M6000 24 GB

464

OctaneBench

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +263%

443

Quadro M6000 24 GB

122

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

Quadro M6000 24 GB

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Mar 2016

Quadro Ada

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz

Base Clock

988 MHz

1560 MHz

Boost Clock

1114 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

20GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

160bit

Memory Bus

384bit

280.0GB/s

Bandwidth

317.4GB/s

Render Config

-

48

SM Count

-

6144

Shading Units

3072

192

TMUs

256

80

ROPs

96

192

Tensor Cores

-

48

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

48 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

106.9 GPixel/s

299.5 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

285.2 GTexel/s

19.17 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

19.17 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.844 TFLOPS

299.5 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W

TDP

250W

250 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104

GPU Name

GM200

-

GPU Variant

GM200-880-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

35.8 billion

Transistors

8 billion

294 mm²

Die Size

601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

5.2

6.7

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

2

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

3

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

4

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI

5

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

6

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

7

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

8

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

9

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

10

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GRID K100

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster