Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (2025MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +1532%
8.294 TFLOPS
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
965 MHz
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.83 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
508.4 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.89 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

35W
TDP
16W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy