Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
12560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +10853%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
100
SM Count
30
12800
Shading Units
240
400
TMUs
80
176
ROPs
28
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy