Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +1011%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
350W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD102
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy