CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
17960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+17092%
92.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2175 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
216
568
TMUs
72
192
ROPs
28
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT200
AD102
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
65 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
300W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
2
NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
3
NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
4
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA L40
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
6
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
8
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
9
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
10
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD FirePro S9170
Related News
1
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
2
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
4
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
5
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
6
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
7
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
8
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
9
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
10
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy