NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+4589%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
64
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.505 billion
Unknown
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
