NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1207MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+151%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2020
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
