Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +8591%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy