NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Lower TDP (95W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+119%
8.637 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Mobile
+228%
1222
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile
+33%
84
Tesla K20Xm
63
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2688
80
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
