Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1480MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +129%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
12 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy