Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +84%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
8192
104
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
12 billion
Transistors
8 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy