CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+84%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
8192
104
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
12 billion
Transistors
8 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
2
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy