Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +1748%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
5
3328
Shading Units
240
104
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GF104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy