NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1230MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile
+2081%
10.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
32
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
