Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +24%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy