NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+3282%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
