Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1762MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +10%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2019
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy