Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV560
-
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Ampere
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy