NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1215MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+918%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A4500 Embedded
+737%
9884
Quadro M2000M
1180
Blender
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2869%
3920
Quadro M2000M
132
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1317%
482
Quadro M2000M
34
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
640
184
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
