NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1292%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
14
5888
Shading Units
448
184
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
