Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +263%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A4500 Embedded +953%
3920
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded +665%
482
Tesla K20Xm
63
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
2688
184
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy