Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +11167%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
48
184
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy