Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1358MHz vs 1215MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +105%
14.31 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
20
5888
Shading Units
2560
184
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
80
46
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy