CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
VS
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q
+974%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q
VS
Tesla C2090
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
512
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
3
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
4
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
5
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
8
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
9
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
10
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy