Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +974%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
16
5888
Shading Units
512
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy