Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +2938%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy