Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +3390%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
7
7424
Shading Units
336
232
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy