Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
10736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A6000 +148784%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
2
10752
Shading Units
16
336
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
10W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy