Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +107%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
274W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy