Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2400MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +1697%
19.66 TFLOPS
Blender
T400 4 GB
210
Arc A770 +892%
2085
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy