Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +676%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
40
448
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
110W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy