Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile +95%
2.607 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.48 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.215 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.607 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy