Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20m +662%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2496
Shading Units
192
208
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy