Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +3543%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2688
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy