CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile
+348%
17.66 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm
372
RTX A4500 Mobile
+773%
3250
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
RTX A4500 Mobile
+426%
332
Tesla K20Xm
VS
RTX A4500 Mobile
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
5888
224
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
235W
TDP
140W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
2
NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
3
NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
4
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
5
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
6
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
7
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
8
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
9
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
10
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy