CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+18%
4.666 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+329%
1597
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
34
Tesla K20Xm
+85%
63
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
VS
Tesla K20Xm
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
2688
120
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy