Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +484%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
64
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
59W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G94
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy