Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 SXM2 +2110%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
4
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
62W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GF106
GP100-890-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy