CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216
+517%
14.13 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216
VS
GRID K520Q
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1536
320
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
3
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
4
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
5
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
6
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
7
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy