Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +1944%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
12
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Volta
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy