Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +1554%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
640
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy