Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1380MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216
14.13 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +1%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
46
5120
Shading Units
5888
320
TMUs
184
128
ROPs
96
640
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy