Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +26459%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
4
5120
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy