Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1530MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +96%
15.67 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
3328
320
TMUs
104
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Volta
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
12 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy