Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +60169%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy