Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +2639%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy