Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +3853%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

900W
TDP
10W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy